Treason or Business? Hindu Nationalists Slam Sunrisers for Signing “Anti-India” Pakistani Player Amid The Hundred Auction Backlash
Treason or business Sunrisers Hyderabad, Hindu nationalists slam SRH Pakistani player, Abrar Ahmed Sunrisers Leeds controversy, Kavya Maran backlash Pakistani cricketer, Sunrisers signs anti-India player – controversy erupted on March 12, 2026, after Sunrisers Leeds (the England-based sister franchise of IPL’s Sunrisers Hyderabad) signed Pakistani leg-spinner Abrar Ahmed for £190,000 (approximately ₹2.34 crore) during The Hundred 2026 player auction. Hindu nationalist groups and online users accused the franchise—owned by Kavya Maran and the Sun Group—of prioritizing profits over national sentiment, labeling the move as “treason” or anti-India in light of Abrar’s alleged past derogatory remarks against India and its armed forces.
The signing shattered expectations that Indian-owned franchises would continue a de facto boycott of Pakistani players in major T20 leagues, a trend stemming from diplomatic tensions since 2009 and amplified by recent geopolitical events like Operation Sindoor (the 2025 India-Pakistan military standoff). Abrar, a mystery spinner known for his international exploits, became the first Pakistani player picked by an Indian-linked team in The Hundred, beating out competition from Trent Rockets in a heated bidding war. Earlier in the auction, Usman Tariq went to Birmingham Phoenix (non-Indian owned) for £140,000, but Sunrisers’ move drew the fiercest ire.
Critics highlighted Abrar’s social media history and on-field comments, including alleged mockery of Indian Army personnel (references to “drinking tea” interpreted as jabs at the 2019 Balakot aftermath and Wg Cdr Abhinandan Varthaman’s capture/release) and anti-India posts during heightened tensions. Social media erupted with hashtags like #BoycottSRH trending, calls to drop the player, and direct attacks on Kavya Maran: “Shame on SRH owner for buying a man who mocked our soldiers,” one viral post read. Hindu nationalist voices on platforms like X and Instagram framed it as betrayal, questioning loyalty amid ongoing India-Pakistan friction and past incidents of Pakistani cricketers making provocative gestures (e.g., gun signs or jet crash mimics during Asia Cup 2025).
Sunrisers Hyderabad and Leeds have not issued an official statement confirming or denying IPL implications, but the franchise emphasized the decision aligned with The Hundred’s merit-based auction. Supporters argue it’s pure business: Abrar is a talented asset for a UK-based league, separate from IPL politics, and boycotts harm global cricket’s growth. The ECB praised the inclusion as proof of non-discrimination, countering fears of a shadow ban on Pakistani talent.
For fans in Delhi and across India, the episode revives debates on mixing sports, politics, and nationalism. While IPL rules bar Pakistani players since 2009 due to bilateral issues, overseas leagues like The Hundred operate independently—yet Indian ownership ties fuel outrage. It echoes recent backlashes, such as KKR’s short-lived signing of Bangladeshi pacer Mustafizur Rahman amid anti-India protests in Bangladesh, which drew BJP and religious leader criticism before his release.
Here’s a quick comparison of the controversy landscape:
| Aspect | Details on Abrar Ahmed Signing (Sunrisers Leeds, The Hundred 2026) | Broader Context & Similar Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Player Signed | Pakistani leg-spinner Abrar Ahmed for £190,000 (~₹2.34 crore) | First Pakistani by Indian-owned franchise in recent T20 leagues |
| Ownership Link | Kavya Maran / Sun Group (same as SRH IPL) | Raises questions on IPL sentiment spillover |
| Main Criticism | Alleged past anti-India remarks, mockery of armed forces | Hindu nationalists call it “treason” or “anti-national” |
| Defense / Business Angle | Merit-based auction; talent over politics; ECB anti-discrimination | Global leagues prioritize performance & revenue |
| Public Reaction | #BoycottSRH trending; calls to drop player; social media fury | Mixed—some praise inclusion, others demand boycott |
| Precedents | Pakistani players unsold earlier; Usman Tariq to non-Indian team | KKR-Mustafizur backlash (Bangladesh player, 2026) |
| Potential Impact | Pressure on SRH IPL image; no direct IPL signing | Highlights India-Pakistan cricket diplomacy strains |
The backlash underscores deeper tensions: for many, cricket remains a cultural battleground where national pride trumps commercial logic, especially with Hindu nationalist sentiments amplifying calls for boycotts. Whether this remains online noise or escalates to formal protests remains to be seen, but it spotlights how geopolitics continues to shadow the gentleman’s game.
FAQ
Which Pakistani player did Sunrisers sign, and in which league? Pakistan leg-spinner Abrar Ahmed was signed by Sunrisers Leeds (linked to IPL’s Sunrisers Hyderabad) for The Hundred 2026, not the IPL itself.
Why is there backlash from Hindu nationalists? Critics cite Abrar’s alleged past anti-India comments and mockery of the Indian Army, framing the signing as insensitive or “treasonous” amid India-Pakistan tensions.
Has Sunrisers Hyderabad responded? No official comment yet from SRH or Leeds; the move was auction-driven for the UK league.
Does this mean Pakistani players could return to IPL? Unlikely—IPL has barred them since 2009 due to bilateral relations; this is limited to The Hundred.
What’s the business vs. treason debate? Supporters see it as smart recruitment for talent; detractors argue it ignores national sentiments and rewards “anti-India” figures.
Sam Michael
Follow us on X @realnewshubs and subscribe for push notifications
Stay updated on the latest cricket controversies, IPL news, India-Pakistan sports tensions, and breaking developments in global leagues—follow and subscribe for push notifications!
